Imagine throwing a dart at a world map, excluding the oceans. Astonishingly, there’s a one-in-four chance it’ll land on an area used for grazing livestock. But here’s where it gets controversial: while we’ve long focused on the environmental impacts of overgrazing, the decline in livestock numbers in regions like North America, Europe, and Australia has been largely overlooked by scientists. Could this shift be as significant—or even more so—than the overgrazing crisis? A groundbreaking study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences by researchers at Arizona State University sheds light on this under-explored phenomenon, using data from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations to track livestock trends from 1999 to 2023. While livestock numbers are rising in parts of Africa, Asia, and Central and South America, they’re declining in the West, raising critical questions about the environmental and climatic consequences of these changes.
The Surprising Gap in Research
Between 1999 and 2023, for every ten studies on overgrazing, there was only one exploring the effects of declining livestock on landscapes. Osvaldo Sala, director of Arizona State University’s Global Drylands Center and a co-author of the study, notes, ‘The mismatch between stocking rate patterns and the scientific literature really surprised me.’ This imbalance means policymakers are often guided by research that focuses predominantly on overgrazing, neglecting the complex impacts of livestock reduction in other parts of the world. As Sala points out, ‘Policy is determined by what scientists tell the broader community, so if the focus is solely on overgrazing, we’re only addressing half the problem.’
The Unpredictable Consequences of Fewer Livestock
The decline in livestock isn’t uniformly beneficial. While some ecosystems may rebound, restoring biodiversity, others could face increased wildfire risk, disrupted water cycles, or even biodiversity loss if regeneration isn’t managed properly. For instance, reduced grazing can lead to more plant growth, which traps carbon but also makes landscapes more susceptible to severe wildfires, releasing stored carbon into the atmosphere. And this is the part most people miss: without comprehensive research, we risk overlooking a critical link between agriculture and climate change.
A Call for Balanced Research
‘It’s not just an opportunity but a necessity if we want a full picture of climate change,’ Sala emphasizes. The study highlights the need to explore even well-understood phenomena, like carbon sequestration by plants, in the context of declining livestock. ‘We need to find out how much carbon is stored, where, and when—we simply don’t know,’ Sala adds.
The Western Perspective: A Blind Spot?
In the American West, where the majority of U.S. livestock grazes, the decline in cattle numbers since 1999 hasn’t eliminated overgrazing as an issue. Wealthy landowners often ignore federal warnings, allowing their cattle to overgraze public lands. Retta Bruegger, a rangeland ecologist at Colorado State University, notes, ‘This paper highlights a critical blind spot in global livestock research. The implications for rangeland health are profound.’ Bruegger suggests that drought and wildfire research could be particularly fruitful in understanding these dynamics. She also stresses the importance of tracking historical livestock trends, especially in the West, where assumptions about constant or increasing numbers are often incorrect.
A Controversial Question for Readers
As we grapple with the complexities of livestock trends, a thought-provoking question arises: Are we focusing too much on overgrazing while neglecting the equally important—and potentially more nuanced—impacts of declining livestock? Share your thoughts in the comments. Let’s spark a conversation that could shape the future of environmental policy and research.
About This Story
This article, like all our content, is free to read because Inside Climate News is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. We don’t hide behind paywalls or clutter our site with ads. Instead, we rely on donations from readers like you to fund our work. Our Pulitzer Prize-winning newsroom has been at the forefront of climate journalism since 2007, holding polluters accountable, exposing environmental injustices, and inspiring action. Your tax-deductible donation helps us continue this vital work and reach even more readers. Will you support us today? Every contribution makes a difference. Thank you for being part of our mission.
